Via the SOAP interface, the ExecutionStatusId seems normalized. We would like to add a status of "In Progress", so that long running tests can note a "running" state. Would it be possible to add a new ExecutionStatusId, or would that break consistency? en-US(C) Copyright 2006-2026 Inflectra Corporation.support@inflectra.com/Computers/Software/Project_Management//Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/KronoDesksupport@inflectra.comhttp://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads120/Support/Forum/spiratest/issues-questions/805.aspxthreadId=805David A Frascone (dfrascone@fusionio.com)statuses Via the SOAP interface, the ExecutionStatusId seems normalized. We would like to add a status of "In Progress", so that long running tests can note a "running" state. Would it be possible to add a new ExecutionStatusId, or would that break consistency? Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:21:20 -05002014-01-24T04:19:19-05:00/Support/Forum/spiratest/issues-questions/805.aspxmessageId=1480Jim R (donotreply5@kronodesk.net) Hi David I'm afraid you cannot change/add to those statuses that would cause the system to behave inconsistently. Instead, add a custom list field to track the progress status of a test case. Or use test sets which already have an 'In Progress' status. Regards Jim Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:19:19 -05002014-01-24T04:19:19-05:00/Support/Forum/spiratest/issues-questions/805.aspx#reply1480